PHP Community · Building an internal platform with PHP from scratch: architecture and decision log

172
phpr/php·posted by bob_chen·just nowTooling

Building an internal platform with PHP from scratch: architecture and decision log

It took me two weeks of on-and-off digging and plenty of wrong turns. Writing the process down as it happened so the next person spends less time.

The first thing was to collapse the variables. We were changing config and upgrading the version at the same time, and afterwards nobody could say which change caused what. We rolled back to moving one variable at a time, re-ran three times, and only then did the curve settle. Tedious, but not skippable.

One last trap: in container environments remember to adjust the memory-related parameters in step. Otherwise the host limit and the process expectation disagree, and the symptom is intermittent, unreproducible failure.

Pphp.netExternal link · opens in a new tab
49 comments

49 comments

M
Cchen_devOP·just now

There is actually a simpler fix that needs no architecture change: move this check up to the gateway and the problem disappears. The cost is one extra lookup at the gateway.

465
Nnikic·2 days ago

Sharing our numbers, 8 cores 16GB, same scenario:

| Concurrency | P50 | P99 |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 12ms | 88ms |
| 500 | 31ms | 340ms |

P99 clearly collapses at 500 concurrency, which lines up with your knee point.

476
Kkite·2 days ago

Worth learning from this debugging approach. We went straight at the logs and took a much longer route.

363
Rran_bo·5 hours ago

One counter-example: below PHP 7.4 the semantics of that code are different, so do not copy it verbatim. We got burned in staging and rolled back once.

270
Lli_ming·5 hours agoedited

I just read the PHP source — the author actually explains the reasoning in a comment, roughly "so that it degrades into predictable behaviour in extreme cases".

1
RraseOP·12 minutes ago

Saved. I am reworking this area this week — this saves a lot of wrong turns.

15
Zzhu_zongOP·2 days ago

This is not a PHP problem, it is a usage problem. The docs say this API is not thread-safe and you must lock around it yourself.

354
Kkite·2 days ago

This matches what we see in production. We only hit it past 3k QPS; the earlier load tests showed nothing — the test traffic was too clean, with no long-tail requests.

154
Oops_wangOP·2 days ago

Can you give a minimal reproduction? I ran it locally for ten minutes and could not reproduce on macOS with the latest version.

112
Bbob_chen·28 minutes ago

We have run this in production for two years without hitting it. That said, we never reached this scale, so our experience is not really evidence here.

137
Bbob_chen·2 days ago

Worth learning from this debugging approach. We went straight at the logs and took a much longer route.

130
Zzhu_zong·12 minutes ago

A question: what changes in a container with a 512Mi memory limit? That is how we run it in production.

91
Aalice_dev·2 days ago

Sharing our numbers, 8 cores 16GB, same scenario:

| Concurrency | P50 | P99 |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 12ms | 88ms |
| 500 | 31ms | 340ms |

P99 clearly collapses at 500 concurrency, which lines up with your knee point.

71
Wwinter·5 hours ago

I see point 3 differently. The trade-off depends on your read/write ratio: read-heavy with little writing means caching actually widens the inconsistency window.

85
Bbob_chen·12 minutes ago

There is actually a simpler fix that needs no architecture change: move this check up to the gateway and the problem disappears. The cost is one extra lookup at the gateway.

1
Zzhu_zongOP·28 minutes ago

I just read the PHP source — the author actually explains the reasoning in a comment, roughly "so that it degrades into predictable behaviour in extreme cases".

1
Bbob_chenOPMod·2 days agoedited

Thanks for sharing real numbers — far more useful than the articles that only cover concepts.

27
Cchen_dev·yesterday

One counter-example: below PHP 7.4 the semantics of that code are different, so do not copy it verbatim. We got burned in staging and rolled back once.

81
Zzhou_yi·1 hour agoedited

Sharing our numbers, 8 cores 16GB, same scenario:

| Concurrency | P50 | P99 |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 12ms | 88ms |
| 500 | 31ms | 340ms |

P99 clearly collapses at 500 concurrency, which lines up with your knee point.

8
NnikicOP·just now

Thanks for sharing real numbers — far more useful than the articles that only cover concepts.

13
Rran_bo·28 minutes ago

Can you give a minimal reproduction? I ran it locally for ten minutes and could not reproduce on macOS with the latest version.

334
Kkernel_panicMod·1 hour ago

I see point 3 differently. The trade-off depends on your read/write ratio: read-heavy with little writing means caching actually widens the inconsistency window.

242
Cchen_dev·12 minutes ago

A question: what changes in a container with a 512Mi memory limit? That is how we run it in production.

351
Sslow_query·2 days ago

Can you give a minimal reproduction? I ran it locally for ten minutes and could not reproduce on macOS with the latest version.

8
Zzhu_zong·2 days agoedited

Agreeing with the above. One addition: with this option enabled the GC count in your metrics doubles, so adjust the alert threshold at the same time or it will keep firing.

44
Wwinter·2 days ago

This matches what we see in production. We only hit it past 3k QPS; the earlier load tests showed nothing — the test traffic was too clean, with no long-tail requests.

35
Aalice_dev·28 minutes ago

There is actually a simpler fix that needs no architecture change: move this check up to the gateway and the problem disappears. The cost is one extra lookup at the gateway.

30
Aalice_devOP·2 hours ago

We have run this in production for two years without hitting it. That said, we never reached this scale, so our experience is not really evidence here.

1
Ttang_hao·12 minutes ago

This matches what we see in production. We only hit it past 3k QPS; the earlier load tests showed nothing — the test traffic was too clean, with no long-tail requests.

24
Zzhou_yi·2 hours ago

Agreeing with the above. One addition: with this option enabled the GC count in your metrics doubles, so adjust the alert threshold at the same time or it will keep firing.

263
Nnikic·2 days ago

Thanks for sharing real numbers — far more useful than the articles that only cover concepts.

130
Nnikic·28 minutes ago

Has anyone run a controlled experiment? I did, reducing it to a single variable, and the difference was 4% — within noise. So I suspect the main cause is something else.

21
Rrase·5 hours agoedited

This is not a PHP problem, it is a usage problem. The docs say this API is not thread-safe and you must lock around it yourself.

27
Kkite·1 hour ago

Thanks for sharing real numbers — far more useful than the articles that only cover concepts.

245
Aalice_dev·2 days agoedited

One counter-example: below PHP 7.4 the semantics of that code are different, so do not copy it verbatim. We got burned in staging and rolled back once.

1
Llinlin·3 minutes ago

We have run this in production for two years without hitting it. That said, we never reached this scale, so our experience is not really evidence here.

26
Zzhu_zong·2 days ago

There is actually a simpler fix that needs no architecture change: move this check up to the gateway and the problem disappears. The cost is one extra lookup at the gateway.

86
Llinlin·just now

Saved. I am reworking this area this week — this saves a lot of wrong turns.

21
Rrase·2 days ago

Sharing our numbers, 8 cores 16GB, same scenario:

| Concurrency | P50 | P99 |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 12ms | 88ms |
| 500 | 31ms | 340ms |

P99 clearly collapses at 500 concurrency, which lines up with your knee point.

18
Rrase·2 days ago

Has anyone run a controlled experiment? I did, reducing it to a single variable, and the difference was 4% — within noise. So I suspect the main cause is something else.

12
Aalice_dev·yesterday

This matches what we see in production. We only hit it past 3k QPS; the earlier load tests showed nothing — the test traffic was too clean, with no long-tail requests.

7
Rran_bo·12 minutes ago

Worth learning from this debugging approach. We went straight at the logs and took a much longer route.

5
Nnikic·just now

This is not a PHP problem, it is a usage problem. The docs say this API is not thread-safe and you must lock around it yourself.

187
NnikicOP·2 days ago

A question: what changes in a container with a 512Mi memory limit? That is how we run it in production.

3
Oops_wang·just now

I just read the PHP source — the author actually explains the reasoning in a comment, roughly "so that it degrades into predictable behaviour in extreme cases".

1
Sswoole_lee·2 days ago

Has anyone run a controlled experiment? I did, reducing it to a single variable, and the difference was 4% — within noise. So I suspect the main cause is something else.

1
Nnikic·2 days ago

Agreeing with the above. One addition: with this option enabled the GC count in your metrics doubles, so adjust the alert threshold at the same time or it will keep firing.

49
Llinlin·2 days ago

I just read the PHP source — the author actually explains the reasoning in a comment, roughly "so that it degrades into predictable behaviour in extreme cases".

149
Zzhou_yi·5 hours agoedited

I see point 3 differently. The trade-off depends on your read/write ratio: read-heavy with little writing means caching actually widens the inconsistency window.

39

This is the post detail page /en/c/php/post/p13. Posts and comments are generated deterministically from a seeded PRNG, so the same post always renders the same content and the link can be shared, reloaded and indexed. In production this page reads MySQL for the post, Redis for hot-post caching, and fetches the whole comment tree in a single query on the path column.

See the database schema →