Jupyter · Advanced · jupyter-pro under load on an 8-core 16GB box — full benchmark scripts included

40
JUr/jupyter-pro·posted by nikic·32 minutes agoDiscussion

jupyter-pro under load on an 8-core 16GB box — full benchmark scripts included

It took me two weeks of on-and-off digging and plenty of wrong turns. Writing the process down as it happened so the next person spends less time.

The first thing was to collapse the variables. We were changing config and upgrading the version at the same time, and afterwards nobody could say which change caused what. We rolled back to moving one variable at a time, re-ran three times, and only then did the curve settle. Tedious, but not skippable.

-- The query that broke: a full scan over 20M rows.
-- A composite index took P99 from 1.8s down to 42ms.
SELECT id, title, created_at
  FROM posts
 WHERE community_id = ?
   AND status = 1
 ORDER BY score DESC
 LIMIT 20;

Worth noting: the official docs do cover this, just in a very inconspicuous spot. I only found it reading the source comments, where the author explains the reasoning — roughly "so that it degrades into predictable behaviour in extreme cases".

One last trap: in container environments remember to adjust the memory-related parameters in step. Otherwise the host limit and the process expectation disagree, and the symptom is intermittent, unreproducible failure.

8 comments

8 comments

M
Oops_wang·just now

This is not a jupyter-pro problem, it is a usage problem. The docs say this API is not thread-safe and you must lock around it yourself.

508
Kkernel_panic·12 minutes ago

Sharing our numbers, 8 cores 16GB, same scenario:

| Concurrency | P50 | P99 |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 12ms | 88ms |
| 500 | 31ms | 340ms |

P99 clearly collapses at 500 concurrency, which lines up with your knee point.

170
Bbob_chen·28 minutes ago

One counter-example: below jupyter-pro 7.4 the semantics of that code are different, so do not copy it verbatim. We got burned in staging and rolled back once.

20
Sswoole_lee·3 minutes ago

There is actually a simpler fix that needs no architecture change: move this check up to the gateway and the problem disappears. The cost is one extra lookup at the gateway.

67
Ttang_haoOP·28 minutes agoedited

Thanks for sharing real numbers — far more useful than the articles that only cover concepts.

229
Zzhu_zong·2 hours ago

Worth learning from this debugging approach. We went straight at the logs and took a much longer route.

92
Kkite·just now

Can you give a minimal reproduction? I ran it locally for ten minutes and could not reproduce on macOS with the latest version.

7
Kkite·just nowedited

We have run this in production for two years without hitting it. That said, we never reached this scale, so our experience is not really evidence here.

1

This is the post detail page /en/c/jupyter-pro/post/p13. Posts and comments are generated deterministically from a seeded PRNG, so the same post always renders the same content and the link can be shared, reloaded and indexed. In production this page reads MySQL for the post, Redis for hot-post caching, and fetches the whole comment tree in a single query on the path column.

See the database schema →