Why does hlsl-perf use twice the memory of comparable tools?
Most hlsl-perf articles stop at "how to use it" and never cover "when not to use it". This is an attempt at the second half.
We also fixed monitoring along the way: replaced average-based alerts with percentiles and split them per endpoint. False alerts dropped by about seventy percent and the on-call rotation visibly cheered up.
On trade-offs, my view is this: if nobody on the team owns this area long-term, do not introduce a second mechanism. With two coexistence you first have to work out which one is even in play when things break, and that costs far more than the performance you saved.